<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Smart Media Group &#187; FEC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smartmediagroup.com/tag/fec/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smartmediagroup.com</link>
	<description>An advertising agency bridging the gap between internet and traditional advertising.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:18:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Leaves Door Open on Corporate Political Spending</title>
		<link>http://smartmediagroup.com/citizensunited-supremecourt/</link>
		<comments>http://smartmediagroup.com/citizensunited-supremecourt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Winn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartmediagroup.com/?p=343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week the Supreme Court postponed a decision on Citizens United v. FEC.  This case arose after the FEC, banned Citizens United, a non profit group from running ads promoting a documentary critical of Senator Clinton during the Presidential primaries called &#8220;Hillary: The Movie.&#8221;  The Court ordered both sides to argue if Austin v. Chamber [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week the Supreme Court postponed a decision on <em>Citizens United v. FEC</em>.  This case arose after the FEC, banned Citizens United, a non profit group from running ads promoting a documentary critical of Senator Clinton during the Presidential primaries called &#8220;Hillary: The Movie.&#8221;  The Court ordered both sides to argue if <em>Austin v. Chamber of Commerce</em> and <em>Section 203 of McConnell v. FEC</em> should be overturned.</p>
<p>Reversing these decisions would be a major victory for free speech proponents as <em>Austin</em> upholds the ban on corporate political spending and<em> Section 203 of McConnell</em> prohibits corporate and labor union spending on broadcast, cable, satellite TV and radio leading up to an election.  This decision, reschedule for the fall has the potential to open up a wave of third party political spending as well as removing the FEC from having to decide what qualifies as a legal expenditure.</p>
<p><em>Reference: 6/29/09 National Review: Bench Memo</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smartmediagroup.com/citizensunited-supremecourt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

